Seeking Alberti
Perspectives, photos and stories from my adventures and studies in development and economics, from my homes in Mozambique and the US, to London and back again.
Monday, May 28, 2012
The Green Revolution: Mozambique style
Monday, May 21, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Swedish Black-Face Female Genital Mutilation of an African Cake that Isn't Art
(1) Where does FGM happen most? Not Sub-Saharan Africa. Not "Black Africa". Mostly in the Arab sections (Sudan, Somalia etc.). This cake/woman is clearly neither the body type or the color of your typical FGM victim in those countries. Bad research - or more precisely - no research. Think Ayaan Hirsi if you want a more accurate picture.
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Here comes another one...

For the dates, see below a map from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC):
Monday, February 13, 2012
Consumption to TB to MDR TB to XDR TB
So, I'm working on a project involving miners and TB in Southern Africa. I just happened to come across this photo blog about TB in the Ukraine. In turn, that reminded me of Paul Farmers amazing book Pathologies of Power which goes into detail about the public health issues of just letting TB in prisons, mines, and the various 'undesirable' populations, run rampant. It leads to horrible versions of TB that are not resistant. Mozambique is now in the throes of that problem, mostly from miners that may be going undiagnosed, or worse, diagnosed but not able to complete treatment due to cross-border movements. Thus MISAU and SADC are trying to figure this out.
If you don't know anything about XDR and MDR TB, check it out here. Wiki Paul Farmer, in case you're new to him. Suffice it to say, he proved that community health on TB worked in Haiti, which means it should in theory work everywhere else. FHI360, Vanderbilt (Friends in Global Health) and others in the public health sphere are all attempting to use his methods to stem TB in Mozambique today.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Maxixe walking and piggery
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Scandalous ads
Translation: "You come to be with them (female)? Don't forget your condom when you leave."
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Agreed. I'm a 'libratarian' on free speech...
Placing the rapist over the fantasy terrorist...
Friday, January 20, 2012
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Mandatory condoms in pornos...
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/01/18/us/los-angeles-makes-condoms-mandatory-for-adult-film-actors.xml
Now, I'm all for safe sex portrayals in the porn industry, but I'm not convinced condoms are the perfect example. I would have preferred a choice: either (1) condoms; or (2) a mandatory section (like ads and the fbi warning in dvds and on internet streaming) where the actors talk to each other about their history, risks, and get tested together. Now that would be educational and informative, and demonstrate to people how adults do it.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
A must read
Great run down of a controversy over King's words and meaning.
Slight variation on 'the uniform'
Monday, January 16, 2012
Friday, January 13, 2012
What's beneath a headline?
Considering yesterday's NY Times debacle - about whether or not journalists should seek the truth or not - it seemed appropriate to get into perspective a bit (as my namesake alberti would have us do).
The question is not just about truth, but research to gain perspectives, based in fact, on the truth (ideally closer to the truth than Rashomon). It seems quite obvious when I write it that way, but really doesn't happen very often. Take the lame excuses for examples given by the NY Times - you don't have to call Romney a liar, but if he says the President is "apologizing" for America, at least explain (1) why he might say that - reference the examples; and (2) give the reader the tools - likely from others - to seek out the truth on their own. I don't think the Truth Vigilante is the right word. But, the Skeptical Reporter might be more accurate.
Here's a more obvious example, and the more pernicious kind - that doesn't deal much with opinion - but in omission. Most of our news media just doesn't ask the other side, reports whats said, and if it sounds good, makes it seem like everyone is in agreement (in that place, town, club, etc.).
Check out this story: "Agreement on Mine Workers' Wages Signed". Sounds benign enough. The "reporter" (all africa is a clearinghouse, so I'm not sure of the source, but likely Noticias) tells us the story about why BCI, a bank, signed an agreement with the Mozambican government about payment of mine workers' wages in a more formal, efficient way. The story goes so far as to mention that "there are sad stories of people being robbed" when going to TEBA to receive their salaries in cash. Lots of good reasons. The Bank says its good, the government, the mines are cool with it. So, who's missing? Any omission?
The miners I've talked to thus far, are very wary of change. Most of them don't trust the bank, were fine with the old system, and wonder what recourse they'll have when they don't receive their salary correctly. You see, TEBA is their recruitment agent, has their contract, and deals directly with the mine. The Bank does none of that. So, there are reasons to worry. After all, they currently don't receive all of their insurance claims on health and funeral costs. So, who's to say the same won't happen at the Bank. Further, Mozambican banks don't exactly have a great image of solid foundations, trustworthiness, or oversight (without the death penalty for the overseer). And you wonder why they might be skeptical?
See my post on the Magermanes for a longer term reason for distrust of such agreements.

